Supreme Workhorses: The Justices’ Relative Workloads Over The Past 5 Terms
Which justices write most frequently, and which write the longest opinions?
Which justices write most frequently, and which write the longest opinions?
A closer look at elite attorneys’ current success at the Supreme Court cert level, from the beginning of 2018 until the present.
Designed to reduce manual docket work by prioritizing what litigators need most: on-demand full docket summarization that explains the whole case to date, followed by on-demand document summaries for filing triage, and AI-powered natural language searching for faster search and retrieval.
Which lawyers have the greatest chance to appear before the justices?
The relationship between ideological distance and decision-making.
Additional context to help understand the justices’ engagement in oral argument, and how they may vote on the merits.
So far the Court has granted 26 cases on cert for the upcoming term. Here, we look at these cert petitions based on different measures of writing quality.
How a former insurance agent built a Houston injury practice around systems, empathy, and disciplined advocacy.
With the Supreme Court highlighting the helpfulness of using state court certification procedures, the number of certified state law issues is only likely to increase.
What the numbers say about cases where a justice authored an opinion related to an order.
Briefs are the most important component of presenting a Supreme Court case. How are the justices using them?
A look at 200 cases from the past year where qualified immunity was identified as a defense.
As federal borrowing caps tighten financing options for law students, one organization is stepping in to negotiate the terms they can't secure alone.
This term alone, groups filed almost 940 amicus briefs on the merits in the 58 argued cases.
How long will a case take to reach resolution?
The NCAA antitrust case is likely to have major implications for intercollegiate athletics. Here's a look at the cases cited by the attorney-advocates and justices.
The data on major players and hotbeds for pre-election voting-related cases.
It’s safe to assume that if judges request corpus-based arguments, they have already concluded that corpus linguistics is a helpful tool — at least in theory.