
Supreme Workhorses: The Justices’ Relative Workloads Over The Past 5 Terms
Which justices write most frequently, and which write the longest opinions?
Which justices write most frequently, and which write the longest opinions?
A closer look at elite attorneys’ current success at the Supreme Court cert level, from the beginning of 2018 until the present.
Explore 5 expert-backed reasons law firms are rethinking the billable hour and how legal billing software is leading the way.
Which lawyers have the greatest chance to appear before the justices?
The relationship between ideological distance and decision-making.
Additional context to help understand the justices’ engagement in oral argument, and how they may vote on the merits.
So far the Court has granted 26 cases on cert for the upcoming term. Here, we look at these cert petitions based on different measures of writing quality.
Proper trust accounting and three-way reconciliation are essential for protecting client funds and avoiding serious compliance risks. In this guide, we break down these critical processes and show how legal-specific software can help your firm stay accurate, efficient, and audit-ready.
With the Supreme Court highlighting the helpfulness of using state court certification procedures, the number of certified state law issues is only likely to increase.
What the numbers say about cases where a justice authored an opinion related to an order.
Briefs are the most important component of presenting a Supreme Court case. How are the justices using them?
A look at 200 cases from the past year where qualified immunity was identified as a defense.
Tired of messy time logs? This free attorney time tracking template helps you bill with confidence and accuracy. Learn more in the full article.
This term alone, groups filed almost 940 amicus briefs on the merits in the 58 argued cases.
How long will a case take to reach resolution?
The NCAA antitrust case is likely to have major implications for intercollegiate athletics. Here's a look at the cases cited by the attorney-advocates and justices.
The data on major players and hotbeds for pre-election voting-related cases.
It’s safe to assume that if judges request corpus-based arguments, they have already concluded that corpus linguistics is a helpful tool — at least in theory.